Why the Things You Want Are Never Enough
- Mark Johnson

- 3 hours ago
- 5 min read
The Surprising Architecture of Human Longing
It is a familiar, modern ache: the promotion that loses its luster within a month, the vacation that fails to quiet the mind, or the suspicion that even after checking every box of success, something essential remains missing. We often treat this persistent restlessness as a psychological "bug" that needs fixing or a personal failure of gratitude. However, these recurring pursuits of money, power, and identity are not random interests, but the great human quests that have repeated across every culture and century. The central question we must face is why these quests consistently fail us exactly when we think we have finally arrived at the summit.
Your Restlessness is a Design Feature, Not a Bug
In the architecture of the human soul, desire is not merely a biological impulse; it is "revelatory." It serves as a persistent clue to the specific end for which we were made. To understand this, we must differentiate between "appetite"—which seeks consumption and is satisfied by a meal—and "desire," which seeks participation and belonging. While appetite ends when the body is full, desire persists because its object is infinite, reaching beyond the immediate toward a fullness it cannot name.
“You have made us for Yourself, O Lord, and our heart is restless until it rests in You.” — Augustine
If you feel dissatisfied even when life "works," it is not a sign that your life has failed. Rather, it is an ontological mismatch between the depth of your longing and the finitude of your chosen objects. The "weight" of the human soul is simply too heavy for finite substitutes to carry, leaving us haunted by a lingering memory of a home we have yet to find.
The "Finite Goods" Trap (Why Our Systems Collapse)
Why do empires, economic systems, and personal lives collapse just as they reach their peak? History reveals a predictable five-step pattern of structural failure that occurs whenever a genuine good is asked to carry an "infinite weight" it was never designed to bear:
A good desire is identified, such as security, love, or justice.
It is absolutized, treated as the source of all meaning.
A system is built around it to maximize that good.
The system produces brilliance and brutality, generating technological progress while simultaneously demanding alienation and conformity.
The system inevitably collapses because a finite good cannot sustain the ultimacy placed upon it.
This pattern is visible in everything from the "Protestant ethic" analyzed by Max Weber to the revolutionary political systems critiqued by Marx. When we treat a gift as a god, it eventually fractures under the metaphysical strain. The "brilliance" of our technological mastery often produces the "brutality" of a soul that feels like a mere instrument in a machine.
The Longevity Paradox: Optimizing the Body vs. Transforming It
Consider the modern war against death, where healthcare spending in the U.S. has reached a staggering $4.9 trillion annually. This is most vividly seen in projects like Bryan Johnson’s "Blueprint," a $2 million-a-year attempt to reverse aging through total biological governance. This quest seeks "longevity"—an extension of our current system of decay—rather than the transformation of the self. By treating the body as a system to be managed rather than lived, we attempt to engineer an escape that remains confined to entropy.
“Idols do not merely disappoint; they distort. They demand sacrifice. They narrow our vision. They turn gifts into gods and neighbors into instruments.”
When health becomes our ultimate concern, the body is no longer a site of presence but a maintenance problem to be solved. We seek to postpone the end, yet optimization can never answer the question of why preservation matters. True life (zoē) is not about infinite duration in our present state, but a new quality of life received through union with the Divine.
The High Cost of Self-Justification (From Achievement to "Karōshi")
In our modern "Gospel of Success," work has shifted from a means of stewardship to a desperate proof of our right to exist. The logical endpoint of tethering identity to productivity is Karōshi—the Japanese term for "death from overwork." This is not just fatigue; it is a visceral "erosion of the self" where the body becomes the "site of collapse" under the soul's demand for self-justification. We work to justify ourselves, yet the verdict of "enough" never arrives.
Research from Stanford indicates that this striving is statistically futile, as productivity per hour drops significantly after 50 hours and vanishes after 55. Beyond this limit, overwork functions as "symbolic performance"—a ritual of busy-ness designed to signal worth rather than produce actual contribution. The theological diagnosis is that true rest is only possible when our worth is "secured prior to work" rather than being the result of it. If identity is not received as a gift, labor will always be a desperate attempt to avoid invisibility.
The Reversed Ladder (Why Ascent Fails)
Most religious impulses are built on the "logic of ascent." We see this in the physical gates of Fushimi Inari or the climbing of sacred mountains. It is a ladder of moral purification where the human reaches upward to touch a distant divine. This assumes that the distance between the finite and the infinite can be bridged by human effort and refined technique.
Christianity, however, makes the radical claim of a "descent." It is not a story of the human reaching up, but of God entering the human predicament. In this "reversed ladder," the "First Mover" is revealed not as a source of cold motion, but as the source of initiating love (agapē).
“No one has ascended into heaven except he who descended from heaven, the Son of Man.” — John 3:13
In the person of Christ, the divine does not wait at the top of the mountain for the spiritual "virtuoso." Instead, God comes all the way down to find the lost. This shifts spirituality from a "technology of control" to a posture of reception, where life (zōē aiōnios) is received through communion rather than secured by effort.
The End of the Search
The persistent failure of our quests suggests that the "answer" we seek is not an idea to be discovered or a system to be engineered. If the Christian claim is true, the answer is a Person who came looking for us in our restlessness. The end of the search is not the end of desire, but the beginning of a relational life (zoē) that is no longer hostage to decay.
Our deepest longings are not mistakes of evolution or personal weaknesses, but signals of our true destination. When we stop asking finite things to give us infinite meaning, we are finally free to enjoy them for what they are.
If your deepest longings were actually a summons rather than a mistake, how would that change the way you live tomorrow?
To explore further see The Answer: How Every Quest Leads to Christ.






Comments